Back to Benchmarks Portal
Controlled Usability Protocol

Participant Evaluation & Likert Feedback

Please complete this anonymous evaluation after performing standard forensic investigation tasks (MBOX import, keyword search, header inspection, and evidence tagging). All responses are stored locally in your browser database for benchmark aggregation.

PARTICIPANTS RECORDED
0 / 15
WORKFLOW TASKS LOGGED
0
STUDY TARGET
≥ 4.0 / 5.0 Mean Rating

Choose your assigned study ID from P01 through P15.

Likert Dimensions (1 to 5 Scale)

Ease of Use
How intuitive and ergonomic was the overall investigation workflow?
4 / 5
1: Very Difficult / Poor5: Excellent / Seamless
Interface Clarity
How clear and readable were the typography, headers, and metadata layouts?
4 / 5
1: Very Difficult / Poor5: Excellent / Seamless
Performance Satisfaction
How responsive did MBOX parsing and keyword search execution feel?
5 / 5
1: Very Difficult / Poor5: Excellent / Seamless
Feature Usefulness
How valuable are the timeline, IOC extraction, and authentication tools?
5 / 5
1: Very Difficult / Poor5: Excellent / Seamless
Forensic Recommendation
Would you recommend MBOX Viewer to colleagues for digital forensic investigation?